... that he didn't belong to any
far right groups:
The suspect apparently had no known links to the right-wing extremist scene. "He just came out of nowhere," a police officer, who did not want to be identified, told the Associated Press. "He hasn't been on our radar, which he would have been if was active in the neo-Nazi groups in Norway. But he still could be inspired by their ideology."
"It's strange that he didn't kill himself, like the guys that have carried out school shootings," the police officer said, adding that the fact that B. was alive meant the police "might get some answers" about his motivation. The officer described the man as "cold as ice."
... I've been amused over the past 24 hours as I watch and listen to "progressives" spin themselves into pretzels trying to find some grain that would connect the Oslo killer with "violent" conservative ideology.
Also amusing is how solidly entrenched the "right/left" canard is, when in reality there is no "right and left" within the Western political system. The "right/left" canard was an invention of Stalin to differentiate his murderous ideology from Hitler's murderous ideology, and from there "leftists" have always referred to those of a "small government, more personal freedom, free-market" persuasion as "right wing" in an attempt to paint them (me) as somehow akin to Nazis and Italian fascists. That's right, personal freedom loving small government free market believers are somehow on the same side of the aisle as the big gov. centrally controlled societies put in place by European fascists in the 40's.
Another amusing canard being spun for all it's worth is the "now you know how Muslims feel" heap of guano. Again, pretzel best describes the logic being woven here ...
... that's right ... conservatives and Christians have committed thousands of acts of terror directed at innocent civilians since 911, and from pulpits across the world Christians are exhorted to violence towards "the other" ... and to top it all off, hundreds of websites abound where Christians and Conservatives encourage lone-wolf or organized attacks on civilians ... especially children. Wherever Christians form a plurality, they violently squeeze out other groups or force them to live as second class subhumans. And finally, even our armies and security forces which have been locked in combat with Islamic forces since before 911 go to the point of risking soldiers lives in order to maximize the chance of civilians being hurt or killed ... especially if they are Muslim.
As horrific as the spree-killing in Oslo is; the event sure has proved instructive whereby the "progressive" class has jumped the shark in an orgy of finger-pointing, mocking, and uppity commentary that serves only to lay bare the thin intellectual foundation that the "progressive" class is built on. But, as Ann Coulter gets it right once again ... "
mob logic" best describes the "progressive" class today.
Never have I felt more confident in being a Conservative, and although I'm an agnostic, seldom ever have I felt more secure in the understanding that the post-modern Christian faith poses no threat to our freedoms or way of life ... unlike the
ultra-violently supremacist political system call Islam.
As to the Oslo killer ... he's just an animal cut from the the Loughner/Harris-Klebold cloth.
Further reading from
Spencer.
Scenario #1:
1. Islamic preachers and texts preach violence and hate.
2. Islamic jihadists kill people.
3. Media and Islamic spokesmen say that only Islamophobes think #1 is even happening, or if it is, that it has anything to do with #2.
Scenario #2:
1. Freedom fighters preach free speech, freedom of conscience and equality of rights for all people, against Sharia and Islamic supremacism that denies those rights, advocating only legal means of protest and dissent.
2. Some nutcase who allegedly expressed allegiance with the freedom fighters kills people, none of whom are preaching Sharia or Islamic supremacism.
3. Media assumes that #1 caused #2 and blames freedom fighters.